Skip to content

Conversation

@andreasnoack
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 14, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 87.59%. Comparing base (fe4e44e) to head (4a48ec4).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master      #56   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   87.59%   87.59%           
=======================================
  Files           6        6           
  Lines         137      137           
=======================================
  Hits          120      120           
  Misses         17       17           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@DilumAluthge DilumAluthge merged commit 09eca87 into master May 14, 2025
10 checks passed
@DilumAluthge DilumAluthge deleted the andreasnoack-patch-1 branch May 14, 2025 15:14
@oschulz
Copy link
Collaborator

oschulz commented May 14, 2025

@andreasnoack should this be added to Julia CI configs in general?

@andreasnoack
Copy link
Member Author

I think that would be a good idea. It is just really useful to be able to kick off a CI run on master. I saw some confusing failures downstream related to this package and speculated if they were a consequence of Julia 1.11 and wanted to check with a CI run. (The issue was actually that the downstream package ran CI with 1.9 but that is a separate story)

@oschulz
Copy link
Collaborator

oschulz commented May 14, 2025

I think that would be a good idea. It is just really useful to be able to kick off a CI run on master.

Thanks, I'll put it on the to-do list for other packages.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants